In short, no.
There has been a lot of talk over the last few days after comments from F1’s boss Stefano Domenicali after his comments about F1 races being too long for the modern audience. In short I think these comments are a load of drivel.
An F1 race generally last between an hour and a half to an hour and three quarters. There are many other sports that last longer, for example. Football (soccer) games often last longer than their allotted 90mins, Cricket matches go on longer as do Tennis matches. Over in the US Baseball games go longer as do most NFL games. There are also other forms of motorsport that go on longer, like Indy car and World Endurance Championship races. Even films these days are longer!
The problem with F1 is not the length of the races, it is everything else. Let me break down my thoughts.
The Cars
In my opinion we are in the worst generation of F1 cars that there has ever been. The thing that makes F1 races seem longer than 90 mins, is the fact that the majority or races are absolutely tedious with very little of interest going on. This generation of ground effect cars, make it almost impossible to drivers to follow consistently and closely. The dirty air that is thrown out the back of the car means the car behind suffers a reduction in car handling due to the turbulent air and also overheating of the tyres and of the car due to the hot air.
The rules were introduced to try and promote racing, but that hasn’t happened. We had a couple of seasons where the racing felt closer and more overtakes were possible, but we have gone the opposite way now. DRS has been around in F1 many years ago as an artificial way to increase overtaking and by proxy improve race excitement. DRS is more effective at certain races than others, some circuits it is only effective if the car behind is 2 plus seconds per lap quicker than the car in front. It is not uncommon these days to see DRS trains where no one can get past the car in front and they all cancel each other out. Take this past race at Zandvoort for example, Hadjar had a DRS train behind him and despite the Ferrari being a quicker car he still couldn’t get past. The reason being, the combination of the style of the circuit, the result of the dirty air and the fact the he may have been quicker, but not by enough of a margin to get past.
I also feel that the current electric/hybrid engines make the sport worse, not only do they sound terrible, they are much heavier than a car with a naturally aspirated engine installed, which means the tyres carrying the car wear and overheat quicker. From 2026 we are going to a more electric 50/50 split of power and I feel this will only make the races worse. Pirelli get a lot of stick about the tyres but the cars are so much more heavier and grip hungry than they have ever been. My opinion is F1 should look at going back to a V10 or V8 naturally aspirated engines, using bio fuel. It’s proven to be possible, Williams have converted Mansell’s old “Red 5” car to bio fuel and it sounds great. There are more options to be carbon neutral than using electric power, which lets face it when you look at the wider picture is not a very green technology.
The Circuits
It is also my opinion that a lot of the tracks that make up the current F1 calendar are terrible and do not promote good racing. We have a lot of street circuits that are terrible for racing and overtaking. Whilst it is very cool to see an F1 car blasting around Singapore at night, let’s face it, generally the races are not thrilling. F1 fans have been calling for less street circuits and we seem to get more every time a new race is added to the calendar. I will say, however that if there were a different style of F1 car, some of these street circuits could well produce good races. A good number of the “classic” tracks that produce good races are either not on the calendar any more, or they are constantly at risk of being dropped off. Monaco is the only “classic” circuit that is never at risk, if there wasn’t such an attraction from the rich and famous for it, it would not be on the F1 calendar.
The Tyres
I won’t dwell on the tyres too much because I have already mentioned it, but the current Pirelli tyres are terrible. Generally speaking, during races drivers cannot push for fear of the tyres falling apart. They all “race” to a target time set by the team, that maximises the strategy and tyre life. They are told not to get too close to the car in front because it overheats and ruins the tyres and they take several laps to come back into their window. It results in boring time trial like races with everyone trying to go as far into the race on one set of tyres as they can. It has long been my opinion that in the age of no refuelling, F1 should introduce a mandatory two stop race. It might allow the drivers to push in races more often if they know they are not required to do 40 laps on the same set. I would also like to see either another manufacturer enter the sport to create another “tyre war” or a completely new tyre suppler altogether if it is to remain as a solo supplier.
The Drivers
I wouldn’t say the current field of drivers is the worst we have seen, however there are a lot of drivers on the grid that I feel should not be there. We also seem to be in a period where every team is looking for the next Max Verstappen. Max is a once in a generation driver, but all the teams, in my opinion are trying to rush these young drivers into F1 and they cannot cut the mustard. Not only is it detrimental to the team, but also to the young driver that may lose their confidence and hinder their career in the long term.
Once upon a time F1 drivers were seen as gladiatorial, they were men, not boys. Drivers used to look physically and mentally finished at the end of the race because they have had to wrestle this beast around a circuit for 50 laps. Very rarely these days do you see the drivers visibly struggling after a race, there is obviously the odd occasion where this is not the case, but most of the time they get out of the car and look like they’ve been on a leisurely drive. Which in some respects I suppose they have been as they have not had to push the car. Obviously you have to take into account the fact these drivers are much fitter than their predecessors, but they also have things like power steering which never used to be the case.
It could be due to the fact that team radio is broadcast more now than it ever has been, but the current crop of drivers seem to complain over the radio so much. All they seem to do is complain over the radio trying to get one another penalties. Just get on with it!
Final Thoughts
I think there are wider issues in F1 than the race length. If they can make the races more entertaining you get more people hooked and for longer, when something is entertaining and engrossing, time evaporates. It’s not rocket science. We are in an age where peoples attention spans are shorter than ever, there are so many distractions and it really takes something to keep someones attention. Also a lot of new fans are coming to sport for drama, they have seen Drive to Survive, where it is edited to portray more drama and entertainment than there actually is. This is because it hooks people in, however when these people watch a race where there is a bunch of cars stuck behind one car their attentions start to go to other things.
Let me know what you think.


Leave a comment